DSpace About DSpace Software 日本語
 

GINMU >
01 奈良県立医科大学 >
012 大学院 >
0122 学位請求論文 >
01221 博士論文(医学) >
2024年度 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10564/4413

Title: Comparison of Quality of Recovery between Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerves Block through Perichondrial Approach versus Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Other Titles: 腹腔鏡下子宮全摘出術における、M-TAPAと肋骨弓下斜角腹横筋膜面ブロックの回復の質の比較:パイロット無作為化比較試験
Authors: Suzuka, Takanori
Tanaka, Nobuhiro
Kadoya, Yuma
Ida, Mitsuru
Iwata, Masato
Ozu, Naoki
Kawaguchi, Masahiko
Keywords: nerve block
pain management
pain
postoperative period
postoperative complications
regional anesthesia
Issue Date: Jan-2024
Publisher: MDPI
Citation: Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024 Jan, vol.13, no.3, article no.712
Abstract: Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through a perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) provides a wide analgesic range. Herein, we examined the quality of recovery (QoR) of M-TAPA for total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) compared with oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (OSTAPB) and measured plasma levobupivacaine concentrations (PClevo). Forty female patients undergoing TLH were randomized to each group. Nerve blocks were performed bilaterally with 25 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine administered per side. The primary outcome was changes in QoR-15 scores on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2 from the preoperative baseline. The main secondary outcomes were PClevo at 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after performing nerve block. Group differences (M-TAPA-OSTAPB) in mean changes from baseline in QoR-15 scores on POD 1 and 2 were -11.3 (95% confidence interval (CI), -24.9 to 2.4, p = 0.104; standard deviation (SD), 22.8) and -7.0 (95% CI, -20.5 to 6.6, p = 0.307; SD, 18.7), respectively. Changes in PClevo were similar in both groups. The post hoc analysis using Bayesian statistics revealed that posterior probabilities of M-TAPA being clinically more effective than OSTAPB were up to 22.4 and 24.4% for POD 1 and 2, respectively. In conclusion, M-TAPA may not be superior to OSTAPB for TLH.
Description: 権利情報:© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10564/4413
ISSN: 2077-0383
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030712
Academic Degrees and number: 24601甲第937号
Degree-granting date: 2024-09-27
Degree name: 博士(医学)
Degree-granting institutions: 奈良県立医科大学
Appears in Collections:2024年度

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
01甲937本文.pdf甲937本文1.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
02甲937本文の要旨.pdf甲937本文の要旨135.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
03甲937審査要旨.pdf甲937審査要旨219.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback