DSpace About DSpace Software 日本語

01 奈良県立医科大学 >
014 附属図書館 >
051 雑誌論文 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10564/2684

Title: クリニカル・ク工スチョンを用いた臨床支援ツールの比較
Other Titles: Comparison of Point-of-Care InformationTools Using Clinical Question
Authors: 鈴木, 孝明
大瀬戸, 貴己
Keywords: evidence-based medicin
point-of-care systems
online systems
comparative study
Issue Date: 20-Dec-2013
Publisher: 日本医学図書館協会
Citation: 医学図書館 Vol.60 No.4 p.459-467
Abstract: For busy physicians,the need to obtain highquality,evidence-based information rapidly is increasing as the importance of evidence-based medicine(EBM) becomes more widely accepted. Various information sources(point of care information tools) have been provided to respond to this need. Some reports have attempted to evaluate these tools. As these reports, the frequency of updates was highest for DynaMed and UpToDate had the largest number of topics. We set 3 clinical questions and compared the results of searches using 3 representative international point-of-care information tools (UpToDate, DynaMed, ACP PIER) and 1 Japanese tool (Konnichi-no Rinsho-Support). The survey showed that 3 international tools provided almost the same core references in their contents. The frequency of updates was not much difference between UpToDate and DynaMed. UpToDate provided recommendations based on not only references but also the opinions of experts. It could be said that UpToDate was the best tool, while it had some difficulties such as the length of sentences and high price. Although topic cover rate was less than UpToDate, DynaMed reached the level of practical use. The structure of ACP PIER is similar to DynaMed. Konnichi-no-Rinsho-Support is expected to be further developed as a point-of-care information tool for ]apanese researchers.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10564/2684
ISSN: 04452429
Appears in Collections:051 雑誌論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
医学図書館60(4)p.459-467.pdf1.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback